Greater persistence and adherence to basal insulin therapy is associated with lower healthcare utilization and medical costs in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess persistence and adherence to basal insulin therapy, their association with all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct medical costs, and predictors of persistence and adherence in adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with US adults with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin therapy between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims data. Persistence and adherence were assessed during 1 year post-initiation per previous definitions. Demographic/clinical characteristics were assessed during the 1 year pre-initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounding variables. Post-IPTW, all-cause HCRU and direct medical costs were assessed during the first-year and second-year post-initiation by persistence and adherence status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of persistence and adherence. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 64,953 patients; 56.8% demonstrated persistence and 41.9% demonstrated adherence. Patients demonstrating persistence and adherence were significantly less likely to have a hospitalization than patients demonstrating non-persistence or non-adherence, respectively. In the second-year post-initiation, total mean all-cause direct medical costs per patient were lower for patients demonstrating persistence and significantly lower for patients demonstrating adherence. Prior use of both oral and injectable antidiabetic medication predicted persistence and adherence compared with patients with only prior oral antidiabetic medication use (persistence OR, 1.50 (95% CI, 1.44 to 1.57); adherence OR, 1.48 (95% CI, 1.42 to 1.55)). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence and adherence to basal insulin was associated with fewer hospitalizations and lower direct medical costs.

Evaluating Patient and Provider Preferences for a Once-Weekly Basal Insulin in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Purpose: The global burden of disease of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is significant, and insulin currently plays a central role in T2D management. This study sought to assess the preferences of patients with T2D and healthcare providers (HCPs) involved in T2D care regarding a hypothetical once-weekly basal insulin in comparison to current basal insulin options. Patients and Methods: In a survey-based study in the United States that included a discrete choice experiment (DCE), patients with T2D (insulin naïve and current insulin users) and providers who treat individuals with T2D were asked to evaluate current basal insulins and identify attributes of importance regarding a hypothetical once-weekly basal insulin. A regression analysis was conducted to identify drivers of preference by relevant demographics, attitudes, and behaviors. Results: Most respondents (91% of patients with T2D and 89% of HCPs in the base case scenario) would choose a once-weekly basal insulin product over another type of basal insulin. Both patients with T2D and HCPs rated insulin type and delivery method to be attributes of highest importance in the discrete choice exercise. Current basal insulin users ("insulin experienced") reported higher levels of confidence that a once-weekly insulin would help them to achieve their desired blood sugar levels compared to their current basal insulin (5.7 vs 5.2 on a 7-point Likert scale). Most insulin-experienced respondents (88%) were likely to inquire about once-weekly basal insulin, and most HCPs (85%) indicated willingness to educate patients on management of their T2D using a once-weekly basal insulin. Conclusion: Discussing preferences for T2D medication management is important for patients and HCPs to ensure treatments are offered for patients based on their preferences. This study showed that patient and provider preferences are similar towards a once-weekly basal insulin over current basal insulin preparations.

Once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists vs dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: cardiovascular effects in people with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), which have proven cardiovascular benefits, are recommended in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, there is limited real-world evidence comparing the effects of once-weekly (OW) GLP-1 RAs and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is). This observational cohort study (1/1/2017-9/30/2021) used data from the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart to compare time to incident clinical cardiovascular outcomes, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and medical costs in new adult users of OW GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4is with T2D and ASCVD. METHODS: Time to occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or their composite and ASCVD-related and all-cause HCRU and medical costs were investigated. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Survival analyses were conducted to compare risks during exposure. RESULTS: OW GLP-1 RA users (weighted N = 25,287) had 26%, 22%, and 24% lower risk of ischemic stroke, MI, and their composite, respectively, compared with DPP-4i users (weighted N = 39,684; all P < 0.01). Compared with DPP-4i users, OW GLP-1 RA users had 25% and 26% lower ASCVD-related and all-cause hospitalization costs, 19% and 23% lower ASCVD-related and all-cause medical costs, 23% and 27% fewer ASCVD-related and all-cause hospitalizations, 13% and 8% fewer ASCVD-related and all-cause outpatient visits, and 8% fewer all-cause ER visits (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In adults with T2D and ASCVD, OW GLP-1 RAs are associated with reduced stroke and MI risks and ASCVD-related and all-cause HCRU and costs vs DPP-4is.

Temporal trends in cardiovascular outcomes and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. CV outcomes in T2D have generally been improving over time but recent data from the US suggest attenuation of trends in older adults with reversal of trends in younger adults. However, published data are only reported through 2015. OBJECTIVES: To quantify trends over time in CV outcomes from 2001 to 2018, and describe changes over time in health care costs in T2D. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study incorporated data from a regional health insurance plan. Study outcomes included acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and all-cause mortality. Poisson regression estimated rate ratios across the entire 17-year study period (RR17). RESULTS: Among 79,392 T2D members tracked on average 4.1 years, overall trends in AMI (RR17 = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.74), HFH (RR17 = 0.82; 0.79, 0.86), and all-cause mortality (RR17 = 0.87; 0.84, 0.91) improved while ischemic stroke (RR17 = 2.36; 2.16, 2.57) worsened. For AMI, HFH, and all-cause mortality, trends in older age groups were significantly better than in younger age groups (interaction P-values < .001). Health care costs related to pharmaceuticals (+15%/year) and emergency department (ED) visits (>15%/year) increased at faster rates than other utilization metrics (+10%/year). CONCLUSIONS: In T2D, overall trends in most CV outcomes improved but smaller improvements or worsening trends were observed in younger patients. Health care costs accelerated at faster rates for medications and ED visits.

Contemporary use of cardiovascular risk reduction strategies in type 2 diabetes. Insights from the diabetes collaborative registry.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease remains the primary source of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We characterized the change over time in the use of evidence-based therapies to reduce cardiovascular risk in US patients with T2D. METHODS: Data from a longitudinal outpatient diabetes registry were used to calculate the prescription of SGLT2i or GLP-1RA over time and among those with high-risk comorbidities (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD], heart failure [HF], chronic kidney disease [CKD]) and a diabetes cardiovascular composite score (DCCS; calculated as: #eligible medications prescribed/#eligible medications x 100 for SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, statin, antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, ACEi/ARB/ARNI). Scores ranged from 0% to 100% (higher=more optimal care). RESULTS: Among 1,001,542 outpatients from 391 US sites, 51.7% patients had ASVCD, 17.7% HF, and 23.0% CKD. The percentage of patients prescribed an SGLT2i or GLP-1RA increased over time (7.3% in 2013 to 28.8% in 2019), and 18.3% of patients with ASCVD, HF, or CKD were on at least one of these medications at last follow-up vs 25.5% of patients without any of these comorbidities. Mean DCCS was 54±36%; 54±25% in patients with ASCVD, HF, or CKD vs 52±50% in patients without any of these comorbidities (P<0.001 for both). In a hierarchical linear model, male sex, and a diagnosis of CKD were independently associated with higher DCCS whereas a diagnosis of HF or ASCVD was associated with a lower DCCS. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, contemporary cohort of patients with T2D, we found improvement in the use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA but unexpectedly lower use in patients with ASCVD, heart failure, and CKD, highlighting a treatment-risk paradox. Further education is needed to shift the understanding of these medications as tools for glucose-lowering to cardiovascular risk reduction and to improve their implementation in clinical practice.

Impact of cardiovascular disease on health care economic burden and resource utilization: a retrospective cohort study in adults in the United States with type 2 diabetes with or without stroke, myocardial infarction, and peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and assess associated health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in the United States. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with a T2DM diagnosis, with or without incident stroke/MI/PAD, were indexed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, from the deidentified Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims database. Incidence of stroke, MI, and PAD was evaluated in the year following T2DM. HCRU and costs were measured in the 12 months following study entry in patients with T2DM + stroke, T2DM + MI, and T2DM + PAD (experimental cohorts) and compared to HCRU and costs in patients with T2DM alone (control cohorts). RESULTS: Incidence of stroke, MI, and PAD in patients with T2DM was 0.9% (n = 16,034), 0.7% (n = 13,681), and 4.1% (n = 68,479), respectively. Compared to matched patients with T2DM alone, patients with T2DM + stroke/MI/PAD had significantly higher total healthcare costs in the year post-index date (T2DM + stroke: +$5962 per patient per month [PPPM]; T2DM + MI: +$7932 PPPM; T2DM + PAD: +$2652 PPPM; p < .05). Patients with T2DM + stroke/MI/PAD had significantly higher mean HCRU than patients without stroke/MI/PAD in all categories measured. CONCLUSION: Having stroke, MI, or PAD was associated with increases in HCRU and costs in patients with T2DM. Although PAD was associated with smaller per patient increases in total healthcare costs than patients with T2DM + stroke/MI, the higher frequency of incident PAD may make it more costly than MI or stroke in a large population of patients with T2DM.

Compared to patients without type 2 diabetes (T2D), patients with T2D have a greater chance of having a stroke, heart attack, and narrowing of blood vessels in the arms and legs (peripheral artery disease [PAD]). A stroke, heart attack, or PAD may lead to hospitalization or death. We sought to understand healthcare usage (hospital visits, emergency room visits, office visits, etc.) and costs associated with stroke, heart attack, and PAD in patients with T2D in the United States. Healthcare resource usage and costs were estimated by using data from health insurance claims to compare healthcare usage and costs among patients with T2D, some of whom had a stroke, heart attack, or PAD, and some who did not. Compared to patients with T2D without stroke/heart attack/PAD, patients with T2D and stroke/heart attack/PAD had more overnight hospital visits, doctors' office visits, and emergency room visits. Patients with T2D and stroke/heart attack/PAD also had longer hospital stays. Patients with T2D and stroke/heart attack/PAD all had higher total healthcare costs in the year following their diagnoses, compared to patients with T2D without stroke/heart attack/PAD. By highlighting the greater costs and use of healthcare associated with stroke, heart attack, and PAD in patients with T2D, we hope to encourage more preventative management of stroke, heart attack, and PAD in patients with T2D.

Changes over time in the cardiovascular risk profile of type 2 diabetes from 2007 to 2020: A community-based study.

AIMS: To quantify changes over time in cardiovascular (CV) risk factor control and in the uptake of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors from 2007 to 2020 in a real-world community-based cohort of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study identified 95 461 T2D patients, who were followed for an average of 6.4 years through a single healthcare organization's electronic health record. The primary outcome was global risk factor control according to four factors ("ABCS"): glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c [<8%]); Blood pressure (systolic/diastolic <140/90 mmHg); Cholesterol (non-HDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL); and Smoking (not). Concomitant presence of microvascular complications and commonly used medication classes were tracked. RESULTS: According to the ABCS metric, global risk factor control did not appreciably change over time; in 2020, 40.9% (95% confidence interval 40.2, 41.5) of patients had all four factors controlled. Among individual components, HbA1c control (<8%) worsened over time from 84% in 2007 to 78% in 2020, while lipid control (non-HDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL) improved from 59% to 72%. Coexisting microvascular complications were more prevalent over time; for example, neuropathy prevalence increased from 21% (2007) to 35% (2020). Use of thiazolidinediones and sulphonylureas decreased over time while metformin, insulin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor use increased. In 2020, GLP-1RAs and SGLT2 inhibitors were each used by 13% of T2D patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based study, global CV risk factor control in T2D did not improve, although glycaemic control worsened and lipid control improved. Given increased uptake of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2 inhibitors, the collective effect of these changes on CV outcomes warrants evaluation.

Comparative Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Warfarin Versus Apixaban in the Treatment of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in a Large U.S. Commercial Claims Database.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), constituting deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common cause of vascular-related morbidity and mortality, resulting in a significant clinical and economic burden in the United States each year. Clinical guidelines recommend that patients with DVT and PE without cancer should be initiated on anticoagulation therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant over a vitamin K antagonist. Yet there is limited real-world evidence comparing the economic burden of warfarin and apixaban in treating VTE patients in a large commercially insured population. OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and effectiveness of warfarin and apixaban and evaluate associated economic burden in treating VTE patients in a large U.S. commercial health care claims database. METHODS: The PharMetrics Plus database was used to identify oral anticoagulant (OAC)-naive patients aged ≥ 18 years who initiated apixaban or warfarin within 30 days of a qualifying VTE encounter and had continuous health plan enrollment with medical and pharmacy benefits for 6 months before treatment initiation. Apixaban initiators and warfarin initiators were matched using the propensity score matching (PSM) technique. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess and compare the risk of major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding, and recurrent VTE. Generalized linear models were used to assess and compare the all-cause health care costs. A 2-part model with bootstrapping was used to evaluate MB- and recurrent VTE-related medical costs. RESULTS: Among 25,193 prematched patients, 13,421 (53.3%) were prescribed warfarin and 11,772 (46.7%) were prescribed apixaban. After 1:1 PSM, 8,858 matched warfarin-apixaban pairs were selected with a mean follow-up of 109 days and 103 days, respectively. Warfarin was associated with a significantly higher risk of MB (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.04), CRNM bleeding (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1017.15-1.40), and recurrent VTE (HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.24-1.82) compared with apixaban. Warfarin patients had significantly higher all-cause medical costs per patient per month (PPPM; $2,333 vs. $1,992; P = 0.001), MB-related costs PPPM ($112 vs. $65; P = 0.020), and recurrent VTE-related costs PPPM ($287 vs. $206; P = 0.014) compared with apixaban patients. Warfarin patients had similar all-cause total health care costs PPPM ($2,630 vs. $2,420; P = 0.051) compared with apixaban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin use was associated with a higher risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE compared with apixaban. Warfarin use was also associated with higher all-cause medical costs, MB-related medical costs, and recurrent VTE-related costs PPPM compared with apixaban. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer, which were also involved in the study design, as well as writing and revising of the manuscript. Guo, Rajpura, Okano, and Rosenblatt are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb. Hlavacek, Mardekian, and Russ are employees of Pfizer. Keshishian, Sah, Delinger, and Mu are employees of SIMR, LLC, which received funding from the study sponsors to conduct this study.

Switching to Another Oral Anticoagulant and Drug Discontinuation Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

We compared the risks of switching to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) and discontinuation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were prescribed rivaroxaban or dabigatran versus apixaban. Patients (≥65 years of age) with NVAF prescribed DOACs (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2017) were identified from the Humana research database and grouped into DOAC cohorts. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate whether the risk for switching to another OAC or discontinuing index DOACs differed among cohorts. Of the study population (N = 38 250), 55.9% were prescribed apixaban (mean age: 78.6 years; 49.8% female), 37.3% rivaroxaban (mean age: 77.4 years; 46.7% female), and 6.8% dabigatran (mean age: 77.0 years; 44.0% female). Compared to patients prescribed apixaban, patients prescribed rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.25; P < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 3.74; 95% CI, 3.35-4.18, P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of switching to another OAC during the follow-up; compared to patients prescribed apixaban, the risks of discontinuation were also higher for patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13, P < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35, P < .001).

Continuation with apixaban treatment is associated with lower risk for hospitalization and medical costs among elderly patients.

Objective: To compare the risk of hospitalization and costs associated with major bleeding (MB) or stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who initiated apixaban then switched to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) vs. those who continued with apixaban treatment. Methods: NVAF patients (≥65 years) initiating apixaban were identified from the Humana database (1 January 2013-30 September 2017) and grouped into switcher and continuer cohorts. For switchers, the earliest switch from apixaban to another OAC was defined as the index event/date. A random date during apixaban treatment was selected as the index date for continuers. Patients were followed from index date to health plan disenrollment or 31 December 2017, whichever was earlier. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine the association of switchers vs. continuers with risk of MB-related or stroke/SE-related hospitalization and healthcare costs during follow-up. Results: Of 7858 elderly NVAF patients included in the study, 14% (N = 1110; mean age: 78 years) were switchers; 86% (N = 6748; mean age: 79 years) were continuers. Apixaban switchers vs. continuers had significantly greater risk of MB-related hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.52-2.64; p < .001) during follow-up; risk of stroke/SE hospitalization did not differ significantly (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.89-2.06, p = .154). MB- and stroke/SE-related medical costs were higher for switchers vs. continuers, although total all-cause healthcare costs were similar. Conclusion: Elderly patients with NVAF in the US who continued with apixaban treatment had a lower risk of MB-related hospitalization and lower MB- and stroke/SE-related medical costs compared to patients who switched to another OAC.

Consistency between Self-Reported and Recorded Values for Clinical Measures.

Objectives. This study evaluated consistency between self-reported values for clinical measures and recorded clinical measures. Methods. Self-reported values were collected for the clinical measures: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, glucose level, height, weight, and cholesterol from health risk assessments completed by enrollees in a privately insured cohort. Body mass index (BMI) was computed from reported height and weight. Practitioner recorded values for the clinical measures were obtained from health screenings. We used bivariate Pearson correlation analysis and descriptive statistics to evaluate consistency between self-reported data and recorded clinic measurements. Results. There was high correlation between self-reported clinical values and recorded clinical measures for diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.91, P = <0.0001), systolic blood pressure (r = 0.93, P = <0.0001), cholesterol (r = 0.97, P = <0.0001), body mass index (r = 0.96, P = <0.0001), glucose (r = 0.96, P = <0.0001), weight (r = 0.98, P = <0.0001), and height (r = 0.89, P = <0.0001). Conclusions. Self-reported clinical values for each of the eight clinical measures examined had good consistency with practitioner recorded data.

Medication adherence in a sample of elderly suffering from hypertension: evaluating the influence of illness perceptions, treatment beliefs, and illness burden.

BACKGROUND: Although many advances in the management of hypertension have been made, success in hypertension control in real-life practice is limited. Control of hypertension is paramount in primary as well as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Poor adherence to antihypertensive medication is one possible reason why success in clinical trials has not been translated into everyday practice. Despite many years of study, questions remain about why patients do or do not take medicines and what can be done to change their behavior. Although trends in adherence patterns across hypertensive patients is briefly documented in the literature, the role of perceived illness burden in addition to illness perceptions and medication beliefs in elderly people with hypertension is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the collective influence of illness perceptions, medications beliefs, and illness burden on medication adherence of a sample of elderly people suffering from hypertension. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey research design, utilizing convenience sampling strategies and a battery of self-administered health surveys, was adapted to address key study objectives. Previously validated instruments, such as the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure Revised II, Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, were utilized to assess illness perceptions, perceived illness burden, medication beliefs, and medication adherence, respectively. Conceptualized associations among the study variables were explored and tested to assess their individual, as well as collective, impact on medication adherence. In addition, combined predictive abilities of key variables in explaining the variations in medication adherence were determined using appropriate bivariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: The majority of the sample was white (76.9%); 52.1% was over aged 65 years of which 47.9% attended some college, while 70.1% accessed adult day care centers. A usable sample of 117 respondents was retained for statistical analysis. From multiple linear regression analysis, it was observed that perceptions about illness, perceived illness burden, and beliefs about medication jointly played a significant role in the prediction of medication adherence (R-squared = 0.328). Significant bivariate correlations among study variables further indicated that threatening view of illness translated into higher levels of self-reported adherence with hypertensive medications (r = 0.332, P < 0.001), which in turn was associated with lower perceived illness burden (r = 0.423, -0.444, P < 0.001). The respondents reported illness-related "Stress" (49.1%) as a primary cause of hypertension in their opinion, followed by "Lifestyle" (43.8%) and "Heredity" (7.1%) factors. Perceived concerns about the benefits of medication played a more significant role in the prediction of adherence and perceived illness burden than the risks associated with their use. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into how perceptions of illness and burden relate to medication adherence in hypertension. More benign perceptions of illness and greater perceived illness burden translate to lower medication adherence. Positive beliefs regarding medications are also crucial for shaping adherence behavior of elderly hypertensive individuals. Threatening views of illness and stronger beliefs of the necessity of medications contribute substantially to positive medication adherence. Interventions and programs aimed at building adherence in elderly hypertension patients need to recognize the value and importance of patient perceptions of illness and medications in shaping adherence behavior.

Role of illness perceptions and medication beliefs on medication compliance of elderly hypertensive cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Poor compliance with antihypertensive medications is one possible reason why its success in clinical trials has not been translated into everyday practice. In addition, medication noncompliance in elderly leads to increased hospitalizations, physician visits, and higher health care costs. OBJECTIVE: The study assessed influence of illness perceptions and medications beliefs on medication compliance of elderly hypertensive cohorts. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey research design, utilizing self-administered health surveys, was adapted to address key study objectives. Conceptualized associations among the study variables were explored to assess their individual as well as their collective impact on the medication compliance. RESULT: A total of 78 (66%) study samples were found to be noncompliant with their medications. Analysis revealed that perceptions about illness and beliefs about medication jointly played a significant role in the prediction of medication compliance (F = 5.966, P < .05; R (2) = .212). Significant bivariate correlations were observed between Morisky's test score versus Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire measure (r = .332, P = .001), Beliefs of Medication Questionnaire (BMQ) differential score (r = .301, P = .001), and BMQ components, such as specific necessity (r = .250, P = .008), specific concern (r = -.231, P = .001), and general overuse (r = -.342, P = .001). CONCLUSION: The findings provide practical basis for designing interventions and programs aimed at compliance building in elderly populations having hypertension by incorporating the value and importance of patient perceptions of illness and medications in order to achieve desired patient outcomes.

Assessing Depression among Older Persons with Arthritis: A Nationwide Health Status Survey.

Objectives. This study aimed to assess the health status of a nationwide sample of elderly persons having arthritis and determine the prevalence of depressive symptomatology in this population. Methods. WebTV technology was utilized to administer health status and depression surveys to a nationally representative sample of 550 randomly selected older persons. Predetermined cutoff scores on Short Form-36 (SF-36) scale and Center for Epidemiological Scale for Depression (CES-D) were used to identify individuals with depressive mood. Results. Sixteen percent (n = 76) of the respondents were found to be at risk for depression. Key associations among health domains of SF-36 and CES-D variables were statistically significant and were in the expected direction. Discussion. The risk of depression among older adults who have arthritis is moderate. A significant decline in multiple domains of health of older persons is likely when depression coexists with arthritis. Early screening for depressive symptomatology and prompt treatment should be an essential part of arthritis management in primary care practice.

Women's Attitudes and Health Beliefs toward Osteoporosis Screening in a Community Pharmacy.

The aim of this study was to examine women's attitudes and health beliefs towards osteoporosis screening in a community pharmacy setting, utilizing the theoretical framework of Health Belief Model. A nonexperimental, cross-sectional research design, examining a convenience sample of women aged 18 and over, from several New York City senior care centers, a church, and a university campus in New York, was employed to assess the study objectives. Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale questionnaire was used to study the attitudes and health beliefs of participants towards bone mineral density screening in community pharmacy. From the study, it was observed that perceptions of severity and susceptibility towards osteoporosis and subjects' demographic characteristics did not seem to significantly influence the decision to screen in a community pharmacy setting. The perceptions of benefits of community pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening and the perceived barriers were found to be of greater importance in women's decisions to engage in osteoporosis-specific preventive behavior.